There is something about society’s laws that deserves closer examination.
In the United States, a young person must be 21 before legally purchasing alcohol. Yet in certain states, a 14-year-old can legally operate a motorboat or personal watercraft, subject to specific requirements.
Does this make sense?
Operating a motorboat comes with enormous responsibility. One mistake can result in serious injury, loss of life or tragedy for other people using the waterways.
Yet we draw different lines when it comes to determining whether a young person is mature enough to make certain decisions.
I am not suggesting that the drinking age should be lowered, nor am I suggesting that teenagers should be encouraged to consume alcohol.
Rather, I am questioning the standards we use to determine maturity, responsibility and accountability.
Perhaps we should ask ourselves whether our laws are being guided by consistent principles or simply by different legislative priorities.
Young people must be taught that rights come with responsibilities, and that freedom without accountability can have serious consequences.
The question is simple: If a 14-year-old can be trusted to take control of a motorboat, why does society consider that same individual incapable of making certain other legal decisions?
This is a conversation worth having, particularly among parents, educators and lawmakers.
A society must not only establish age limits; it must also explain the reasoning behind them.
A concerned citizen
Gordon Laughlin,
Westmoorings
